[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#923162: RFS: python-rfid/1.2 [ITP] -- friendly greeter



Hi,

the doc/RDM6300_doc.pdf is just a datasheet taken from
https://elty.pl/upload/download/RFID/RDM630-Spec.pdf. Should I remove it
since I do not have a build script? Nevertheless the PDF is excluded
from Debian package.

I prefer having just one repo. But if it is necessary I upload it on salsa.

Regards,
Philipp

Am 28.02.19 um 17:35 schrieb Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 06:24:43PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> 1. Please separate the packaging of your project (the src/debian/
>> directory) and place it in a packaging repository on salsa.debian.org.
>> This is the usual practice now.
> I can't call this "the usual practice". The usual practice is publishing a
> repo that allows building a Debian package but we don't require that. The
> usual practice is publishing it on salsa but we don't require that either.
> As for the repo contents, the usual practice is a branch with upstream
> sources merged into a branch with upstream sources + debian. And when you
> publish a packaging repo it should be an useful packaging repo and not
> just something on salsa.
> 
>> 5. Is doc/RDM6300_doc.pdf your own creation, or taken from somewhere
>> else? In the latter case, please take into consideration possible
>> licensing restrictions on its usage.
> The bigger problem is that the package must also ship the PDF sources and
> build scripts.
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: