Re: Backwards-incompatible ABI change due to function rename
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:37:51PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On 2019-03-04 13:32, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > What does the upstream say about this?
>
> The upstream says that the renamed functions are not documented,
> therefore they are private-ish. However, strictly speaking these
> functions are public, as they are accessible in the ABI.
But, are they actually available from the published API?
And do reverse dependencies use those functions?
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Have you accepted Khorne as your lord and saviour?
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
Reply to: