On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 01:29:44PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > I am maintaining a package which has recently endured a > backwards-incompatible ABI change due to a couple of function renames. I > could restore the ABI compatibility by providing aliases (via patches) > for the renamed functions. My question is: would this be a viable > solution, or should I change the SONAME? What does the upstream say about this? The ideal way would be bumping the soname (or restoring the removed names) upstream. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature