On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 06:24:43PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > 1. Please separate the packaging of your project (the src/debian/ > directory) and place it in a packaging repository on salsa.debian.org. > This is the usual practice now. I can't call this "the usual practice". The usual practice is publishing a repo that allows building a Debian package but we don't require that. The usual practice is publishing it on salsa but we don't require that either. As for the repo contents, the usual practice is a branch with upstream sources merged into a branch with upstream sources + debian. And when you publish a packaging repo it should be an useful packaging repo and not just something on salsa. > 5. Is doc/RDM6300_doc.pdf your own creation, or taken from somewhere > else? In the latter case, please take into consideration possible > licensing restrictions on its usage. The bigger problem is that the package must also ship the PDF sources and build scripts. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature