Bug#909052: RFS: rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/0.18.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar"
* Package name : rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar
Version : 0.18.1-1
Upstream Author : David Mohammed fossfreedom@ubuntu.com
* URL : github.com/fossfreedom/alternative-toolbar
* License : GPLv3
Section : misc
It builds those binary packages:
rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar - Enhanced play controls and
interface for Rhythmbox
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar/rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar_0.18.1-1.dsc
Notes:
I am the author of this plugin and maintainer of the package in both
Debian and Ubuntu.
The following checks have been made:
lintian -i -I --pedantic on the built source. This is lintian free
except for one pedantic - testsuite-autopkgtest-missing ; I don't
consider it necessary to create a autopkgtest suite for this python
plugin for rhythmbox
check-all-the-things has been run on the source
pbuilder-dist unstable build - this package was successfully built.
If possible please can I be allowed to continue maintaining this in
the future by DM upload privileges through auth via dak
fossfreedom@ubuntu.com ? N.B. my debian maintainer key is registered
in the maintainership keyring
Changes since the last upload:
* Bug fix and Translation release
- Use precise repeat one code rather than the previous estimate method
- Fix laggy volume slider
- Fix buggy click-to-seek
- Use default GNOME Headerbar spacing
* Packaging Changes:
- control: Bump Standards-Version - rules updated for verbose build
- control: Correct Vcs-Browser URL
- copyright: Refresh to capture revised copyright holders
- rules: Removed unnecessary --parallel
Regards,
David Mohammed
Reply to: