[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#916859: closed by Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> (Re: Bug#916859: RFS: PDF Studio Viewer/2018 [ITP] -- pdf viewer)



Hello Andrey,

Regarding the solution on Bug#916859 about our package "pdfstudioviewer"

It's free in the real sense of the term, meaning that users don't pay for it. But it is not open source. Our end-user license is displayed to users upon running our application the first time. 

We don't care if our application is listed under the Free or the Commercial products. 

We have a Debian installer so I hope you can use that.

PDF Studio Viewer is not just another PDF Reader, it can annotate, fill interactive forms and has very advanced viewing, searching and printing features. It's fully compliant with Adobe products. We've been working on this application for 15 years. 

It should be easy to submit our application to Debian because it is beneficial to Debian users to have a quality full-featured PDF Reader. 

Thanks,
Tsan Sam

Technical Support
PDF Studio Support

Got More Questions? 
Try PDF Studio Knowledge Base


-----Original Message-----
From: Debian Bug Tracking System [mailto:owner@bugs.debian.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 11:30 AM
To: Studio Support
Subject: Bug#916859 closed by Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> (Re: Bug#916859: RFS: PDF Studio Viewer/2018 [ITP] -- pdf viewer)

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package:

#916859: RFS: PDF Studio Viewer/2018 [ITP] -- pdf viewer

It has been closed by Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate message then please contact Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> by replying to this email.


--
916859: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916859
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: