Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
> Shouldn't not so much used packages preferably not be backported (to
> avoid maintenance costs to other involved parties) ?
The backports policy says "Please only upload package with a notable
userbase. User request for the package may be an indicator.", but I
guess this package qualifies based on the popcon information for
streamlink and livestreamer:
https://backports.debian.org/Contribute/
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=streamlink
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=livestreamer
> Also, why should backports be uploaded after the unstable package enter
> testing ?
> To ensure there is a clean upgrade path from stable / stable-backport to
> testing ?
The backports policy says "To guarantee an upgrade path from
stable+backports to the next stable, the package should be in
testing."
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: