Le 09/03/2018 à 03:14, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new >> upstream version 0.11.0. > > Uploaded. > > PS: if you would like to upload an official backport, feel free to > file another RFS for that when it reaches testing. > Thanks :) About the backport, I'm keeping it in a unofficial repository as there were not so much downloads. Now that this repository is advertised on streamlink download page, I might reconsider this choice. Shouldn't not so much used packages preferably not be backported (to avoid maintenance costs to other involved parties) ? If, in any case, unofficial backports are better made official, I can surely target official backports repository. Also, why should backports be uploaded after the unstable package enter testing ? To ensure there is a clean upgrade path from stable / stable-backport to testing ? -- Alexis Murzeau PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC 2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature