[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#891643: marked as done (RFS: inkscape-open-symbols/1.2.1-1)

Your message dated Sat, 3 Mar 2018 19:58:26 +0100
with message-id <20180303185826.nuo6vcxxwc7cczlm@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#891643: RFS: inkscape-open-symbols/1.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #891643,
regarding RFS: inkscape-open-symbols/1.2.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
891643: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "inkscape-open-symbols".

Download with dget:

    dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/inkscape-open-symbols/inkscape-open-symbols_1.2.1-2.dsc

Or build it with gbp:

    gbp clone --pristine-tar
    https://salsa.debian.org/felix-guest/inkscape-open-symbols.git
    cd inkscape-open-symbols
    gbp buildpackage

I'd appreciate if you could also give me upload rights for this package.

Thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 05:27:37PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the latest version of my package "inkscape-open-symbols".

✓

> I'd appreciate if you could also give me upload rights for this package.

✓


-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ 
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ A dumb species has no way to open a tuna can.
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ A smart species invents a can opener.
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ A master species delegates.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: