Bug#889515: Review of persepolis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
I had a look at your packaging, and found the following:
(-) debhelper 10 -- some advise 11
(-) standard-version 4.1.2 -- we're now at 4.1.3
(-) in d/copyright, you could share the license chunks:
Files: foo
Copyright: whatever
License: GPL-3+
Files: bar
Copyright: whatever
License: GPL-3+
License: GPL-3+
Here comes the text, once!
Then I tried to compile it, and saw what lintian had to say:
$ lintian -I persepolis_3.0.1-1_amd64.changes --pedantic
P: persepolis source: package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 10
(see above: should fix)
W: persepolis source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique
(paragraph at line 26)
(see above: must fix)
I: persepolis source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.1.2 (released
2017-11-30) (current is 4.1.3)
(see above: should fix)
I: persepolis source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing
(ok, it's not always possible)
P: persepolis source: debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature
(ok, it's not always possible)
P: persepolis: no-upstream-changelog
(ok, it's not always possible)
I: persepolis: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
(should fix)
I hope that helps,
Snark on #debian-mentors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=EBk+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: