Re: Droping v5 extension to library names
Hi,
>when libraries were build with gcc 5 'v5' was added to the soversion
>inside the library name. Should this extension be kept even if there is
>a new soversion. For instance for the package libbpp-core2v5 which has
>now soversion=3. Should the new package be named
>
> libbpp-core3v5
>or
> libbpp-core3
the latter.
and if you backport libbpp-core-3v5 to jessie-backport (so, with an old-ABI
libstdc++ or whatever), don't forget to rename it back to libpp-core-3)
G.
Reply to: