[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#848687: marked as done (RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1)



Your message dated Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:00:22 +0000
with message-id <20170103090022.kipnlidex2xzedqh@zephyr.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#848687: RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #848687,
regarding RFS: yasnippet-snippets_0~git20161123-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
848687: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848687
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Hello,

I have packaged a new version of yasnippet-snippets:

https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/yasnippet-snippets.git/

I am looking for someone in the Debian Emacsen team to sponsor this
upload.

Thanks!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Alberto,

Uploading in a moment.

I'd encourage you to investigate the .dpkg-new issue some more, as it
would be better not to have that patch.

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 06:20:09PM +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> This time I have not set the git tag just in case some more
> modifications are needed.  Now I see that it is better to leave it unset
> since the uploader is the one that has the last word about it.  Please
> feel free to set it if you think the package is ready for uploading.

Okay, will push.

Note that this only works when your sponsor is on the pkg-emacsen team!

Thank you for your contribution.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: