[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Libraries with "extra" priority?



On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:55:21AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > >This "must" policy requirement has long gone past "pointless" deep into the
> > >"actively harmful" land.  It is universally ignored, and I'd advise you to
> > >do so too.
> > 
> > what about changing the policy? I admit I never cared too much about
> > such priorities, and I would like it to be relaxed/removed in policy whenever
> > possible.
> 
> #758234, which is somehow stalled for years, calls for removal of this
> requirement.  
#759260, OTOH, calls for removal of 'extra'.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: