control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hello again! Am 20.06.2016 um 13:08 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
you gave me a good answer here, so, please add it again then (libboost-dev is fine in this case!)
Ok.
There is a good reason, but I see that it is unnecessarily tortuous to do so. That’s why everything under GPL-2+ now.if you provide an explanation I can accept it, this is not about you being wrong and me being right, it is about discussion and accept a common point of view :) as I did above, I accepted your explanation and asked to restore your solution
Don’t worry, I didn’t feel urged to do so. As I said, I recently came to the conclusion that several copyrights instead of only one are unnecessarily tortuous. (If you are interested: I originally wanted my Makefile not to be GPL so that others could use it absolutly free for their project. But in fact this Makefile is not so “brilliant” and that’s why it’s not worth the effort.)
we are talking about copyright in upstream tarball. I can understand a symlink in debian/copyright, but shouldn't the upstream tarball have a LICENSE file explaining the license text?
Ok.
I guess we are mostly ready now!
I hope everything is ok now. Review is waiting for you!