Bug#824466: RFS: setop/0.1-1 [ITP]
Hello Gianfranco,
I think we are nearly ready, don’t give up.
Am 20.05.2016 um 21:59 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
I deleted the dependence libboost-dev as suggested, ALTHOUGH I am not
sure if that is correct.
The documentation just says “This package provides headers.” Besides
regex and program-options I indeed need some other headers and now I
don’t know if these are installed for sure.
each sublibrary has its headers and its libraries, so you need just the minimum set
needed.
Nevertheless, I don’t see why e. g. boost/algorithm/string/trim.hpp is
guaranteed to be installed. It might be a coincidence that it is
included by regex or program-options. In my case e. g. libboost1.58-dev
was automatically installed together with regex/program-options.
(But you do not need to explain. I just wanted to exclude an error.)
Changed the text according to the examples.
I still don't get why having two licenses.
There is a good reason, but I see that it is unnecessarily tortuous to
do so. That’s why everything under GPL-2+ now.
you need a LICENSE file inside your tarball, with the license text inside,
otherwise the package will be probably rejected.
Really?
<www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#copyright> says,
common licenses may just be refered.
(BTW std-version is 3.9.8 now)
Ok.
Thx for all the work and your patience,
Frank
Reply to: