Bug#827043: RFS: gdbm/1.12-1 ITP

[Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>]

Hi,





>My bad. I should put 'apt-get update' into cron.


or use "pull-debian-source packagename [version]" :)
>Sent it. Seems I can't include control into message to
>826639@bugs.debian.org


package is now in QA
>I considered some of them. Other require more prolonged
>experimentation on my side and communication with upstream. I am not
>aganist to defer them to -2 revision.


ack

>New concept for me. Will read.


as said (sorry Sven for saying twice the same, I didn't read completely your message
on my first attempt)

you have to go for experimental, test buildability of reverse-dependencies and then
ask for a transition slot.
(I can help here if needed)

I built, signed and uploaded on deferred/1, the package was good enough to me
(there was a gfdl lintian pedantic warning, but seems a false positive, lets
see if ftpmasters have the same opinion)

the "no" for invariant section was on the above line, and lintian seems to be
not smart enough to detect this.

(please let me know for the followup transition on unstable)

Gianfranco