[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#818921: RFS: python-neovim-gui/0.1.1-1 [ITP]



tags 818921 - moreinfo
thanks

On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
<locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> >> please add them as build-dependencies and check that python3:Depends do its job
> >
> >Fixed.
> >* Added neovim check.
> >* python3-click is only present on testing and unstable as 6.2, I have
> >   added the check but it could be dropped.
> >* pygobject is provided by python3-gi-cairo, python3-cairo,
> >   gir1.2-gtk-3.0 as jpleau and I tracked down [2][3].
> 
> 
> no. You need to add them to build-dependencies, remove them from runtime-dependencies and
> verify python3:Depends is actually adding them. (by opening the built deb file and checking the debian/control inside).
>
> install_requires is parsed during build, and information is extracted and converted in needed runtime
> Debian packages.
> (feel free to keep them in both build-dependencies and runtime-dependencies if the version is not correctly parsed)
> (see borgbackup git history of debian/control file)

That's indeed the case, the version doesn't get parsed. I have left them
in Depends.


> is it more a module or an application?
> I guess an application, so maybe the applications team is more
> appropriate
> you cant do something like
> python3
> import neovim-gui, right?

It ships things on /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/, so it's a module
with a script then.


> pynvim
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pynvim", line 5, in <module>
> from pkg_resources import load_entry_point
> ImportError: No module named 'pkg_resources'

Fixed.


I have removed the moreinfo tag, ready for a RFS.

Thanks in advance :)

Cheers,


-- 
Víctor Cuadrado Juan           me@viccuad.me

PGP key ID: 4096R: 0xA2591E231E251F36
Key fingerprint: E3C5 114C 0C5B 4C49 BA03  0991 A259 1E23 1E25 1F36
My signed E-Mails are trustworthy.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: