[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#818687: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.4.1-1.1 [NMU]



control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo


Hi Dimitri, I see you already acked the change on 780081, so I would like to 

sponsor this package (if I remember correctly you like also cosmetical changes on NMUs, so I'll
ask to bump std-version and something more).

I did a preliminary review on pkg-multimedia mail list [1] (where Nicholas applied for the team join)


please address the issues I raised, and remove the moreinfo tag once done, and I'll do another spin.


[1] https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2016-April/050863.html

thanks,

Gianfranco

Il Sabato 19 Marzo 2016 19:36, Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves@gmail.com> ha scritto:



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for an upload of "btrfs-progs" to experimental.  In Bug#780081 the
package maintainer had planned to do this, and I posted a link to this package to that bug
report over two weeks ago.  Given how difficult it is to reach Dimitri J. Ledkov, he must be
very busy, so I'd like to help out!
  
Package name    : btrfs-progs
Version         : 4.4.1-1.1
Section         : admin

It builds those binary packages:

btrfs-progs - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities
btrfs-progs-dbg - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (debug)
btrfs-progs-udeb - Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities (udeb) (udeb)
btrfs-tools - transitional dummy package
btrfs-tools-dbg - transitional dummy package

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/btrfs-progs


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/btrfs-progs/btrfs-progs_4.4.1-1.1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream release.
   * Rename package to btrfs-progs (Closes: #780081)

Kind Regards,
Nicholas D Steeves


Reply to: