Bug#842429: RFS: mlocate/0.26-1.1 [NMU]

[Dan Mick <dmick@redhat.com>]

On 11/08/2016 09:11 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tag -1 moreinfo
> 
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:50:51PM -0700, Dan Mick wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mlocate"
> 
> o/

Thanks, Mattia.

> (though that template ought to be more clever and don't claim "my
> package" for a NMU :P)

I wondered about that, but the instructions were pretty explicit.  Mongo
only pawn in game of life.

>> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mlocate/mlocate_0.26-1.1.dsc
> 
>> mlocate (0.26-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>>
>>   * Non-maintainer upload.
>>   * Add cephfs to PRUNEFS and /var/lib/ceph to PRUNEPATHS
>>     Closes: #786433
> 
> Now, that .dsc has a lot of noise:
> it creates stuff in .pc and debian/patches, which is completely
> irrelevant for this package that is not debian source format
> '3.0 (quilt)' (it's not specified, hence 1.0), and it's not using any
> patch system
> 
> Am I right that the only relevant change is this?
> 
> diff -u mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf
> --- mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf
> +++ mlocate-0.26/debian/updatedb.conf
> @@ -3,2 +3,2 @@
> -PRUNEPATHS="/tmp /var/spool /media"
> -PRUNEFS="NFS nfs nfs4 rpc_pipefs afs binfmt_misc proc smbfs autofs iso9660 ncpfs coda devpts ftpfs devfs mfs shfs sysfs cifs lustre tmpfs usbfs udf fuse.glusterfs fuse.sshfs curlftpfs"
> +PRUNEPATHS="/tmp /var/spool /media /var/lib/ceph"
> +PRUNEFS="NFS nfs nfs4 rpc_pipefs afs binfmt_misc proc smbfs autofs iso9660 ncpfs coda devpts ftpfs devfs mfs shfs sysfs cifs lustre tmpfs usbfs udf fuse.glusterfs fuse.sshfs curlftpfs ceph fuse.ceph"
> 
> 
> If so, please clean up d/patches and .pc, and rebuild.  Run debdiff on
> the previous version of the package to make sure the thing is clean.

Yep, that's the only relevant change, and I would have sworn it was
quilt.  I'll redo.

> I'd also ask you to close the ubuntu bug too (just add 'LP: #1281074' in
> the changelog), that way when the package will be synced/merged it'll be
> automatically closed (actually, not sure for the "merged" part, but
> anyway…).

Super.  Thanks again.

> Then.. I'd like to rewrite the whole packaging part of that package, but
> this is a NMU and changes should be minimal....
>