Bug#830528: marked as done (RFS: clutter-gesture/0.0.2.1-7.1 [NMU, RC] -- Open GL based interactive canvas library Gesture framework)
Your message dated Sat, 9 Jul 2016 09:01:28 +0000 (UTC)
with message-id <1756961987.129261.1468054888632.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#830528: RFS: clutter-gesture/0.0.2.1-7.1 [NMU, RC] -- Open GL based interactive canvas library Gesture framework
has caused the Debian Bug report #830528,
regarding RFS: clutter-gesture/0.0.2.1-7.1 [NMU, RC] -- Open GL based interactive canvas library Gesture framework
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
830528: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Control: block 811585 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU of clutter-gesture, fixing a stretch RC
bug (older than 7 days and no maintainer activity).
I have verified this NMU in the following ways:
- fixes the bug: builds with GCC 6
- builds in a current clean sid chroot (i.e. builds without gcc-6, too)
It currently fails piuparts due to a piuparts bug, #830527.
* Package name : clutter-gesture
Version : 0.0.2.1-7.1
Upstream Author : Intel Corp.
* URL : http://www.clutter-project.org/
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Section : libs
Changes since the last upload:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Add 09_fix_build_with_gcc_6.patch (Closes: #811585).
Download with dget:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clutter-gesture/clutter-gesture_0.0.2.1-7.1.dsc
Thanks.
--
Sean Whitton
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
>I have verified this NMU in the following ways:
In deferred/2, BTW I'm impressed for the patch
did *really* gcc started looking at indentation of c code?
impressive.
thanks,
G.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: