Bug#822990: RFS: hashcat/2.00-1 [ITP]
Hi Eriberto!
2016-05-07 15:29 GMT-05:00 Eriberto <eriberto@eriberto.pro.br>:
> control: tags 822990 moreinfo
>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I will try help you.
>
Really thank you very much for your help
> 1. d/control:
>
> - You used 'extra' as Priority. Is there any special condition to use
> it instead of 'optional'? Please, read it[1].
>
> [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities
>
Fixed!
> - (OPTIONAL) Your long description for hash-cat don't have some
> keywords, as SHA256. So, several users won't find your package via
> apt-cache search command. There is a long list about resources to be
> cracked by hashcat in its homepage. I suggest to improve the
> description.
>
Fixed!
> - Please, can you add a period in the last line of the file? (long
> description for hashcat-data)
>
Fixed!
> 2. d/hashcat-data.docs: IMO, the files docs/user_manuals.txt and
> README.md should be put in d/hashcat.docs.
>
Fixed!
> 3. d/hashcat-dirs: this file is empty. Can you remove it?
>
Fixed!
> 4. d/watch: please, remove the useless lines.
>
Fixed!
> 5. After the build, I can see that hashcat-xop is not necessary in d/clean.
>
Fixed!
> Regards,
>
> Eriberto
>
I updated the package in mentors with the new changes.
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hashcat/hashcat_2.00-1.dsc
Thank you very much!
Regards
Daniel
--
Daniel Echeverry
http://wiki.debian.org/DanielEcheverry
http://rinconinformatico.net
Linux user: #477840
Debian user
Reply to: