[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#793171: RFS: git-lfs/0.5.2-1 [ITP]



Hugo,

Sounds good.  New package uploaded in the same place (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git-lfs/git-lfs_0.5.4-1.dsc) with the new copyright file.  What are the next steps?

Stephen

On Aug 19, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Hugo Lefeuvre <hugo6390@fr33tux.org> wrote:

Hi Stephen,

(1) debian/control:
-------------------

 - Concerning git "(>= 1.8.0)": The version in jessie-backports is
   2.1, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a
   backport to stable. This condition would also be verified in case
   of a backport to oldstable since the version in wheezy-backports is
   1.9.1.
 - Concerning golang-go "(>= 1.3.0)": The version in jessie is
   1.3.3, so anyway this condition will be verified in case of a
   backport to stable. This condition would also be verified in case
   of a backport to oldstable since the version in wheezy-backports is
   1.3.3.

FYI, the Release Team doesn't always accepts backports to stable.
However, if the backport of your package is accepted, it will go
to the jessie-backports archive[0].

I completely understand that.  My point was that I think it is
beneficial to keep the version requirements there in case someone
wants to backport it.  That way they will not run into unexpected
problems.  If you don't think that is beneficial I can remove it.

Anyway, I'm nitpicking. Let it if you want.

I've made a new review of your package and I've found a last problem
in your d/copyright file: The Expat license paragraph is malformed.
I've attached a correct version.

Regards,
Hugo

--
     Hugo Lefeuvre (hugo6390)    |    www.hugo6390.org
4096/ ACB7 B67F 197F 9B32 1533 431C AC90 AC3E C524 065E
<copyright.txt>


Reply to: