[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Bug#792200: closed by Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> (Re: Bug#792200: RFS: roxterm/3.0.2-1)
To
:
792200@bugs.debian.org
, Debian Mentors <
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>, Vincent Cheng <
vcheng@debian.org
>
Subject
: Bug#792200: closed by Vincent Cheng <
vcheng@debian.org
> (Re: Bug#792200: RFS: roxterm/3.0.2-1)
From
: Tony Houghton <
h@realh.co.uk
>
Date
: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:11:19 +0100
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
55C34EE7.3010003@realh.co.uk
>
Reply-to
: Tony Houghton <
h@realh.co.uk
>,
792200@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to
: <handler.792200.D792200.14367647883784.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
References
: <CACZd_tCBJZtsRa3L6BQ_ic+sa=DRZsXTgTS2TNVEFBrdeh8twQ@mail.gmail.com> <55A27071.3030209@realh.co.uk> <handler.792200.D792200.14367647883784.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
Hi,
I got emails saying that roxterm 3.0.1-1 and then 3.0.2-1 were uploaded
and the RFS bugs closed (the latter on 13 July), but the latest version
showing up in the archives is still 2.9.5-1. Has something gone wrong
with the upload?
Reply to:
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Tony Houghton (on-list)
Tony Houghton (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Bug#792200: closed by Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> (Re: Bug#792200: RFS: roxterm/3.0.2-1)
From:
Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org>
Prev by Date:
Re: RFS: Looking for a mentor for my dspdfviewer package
Next by Date:
Bug#792774: RFS: filters/2.54 [ITA]
Previous by thread:
Bug#792774: RFS: filters/2.54 [ITA]
Next by thread:
Re: Bug#792200: closed by Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> (Re: Bug#792200: RFS: roxterm/3.0.2-1)
Index(es):
Date
Thread