[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#788844: RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 [ITP]



Il giorno dom, 12/07/2015 alle 20.38 +0200, Tomasz Buchert ha scritto:
> On 11/07/15 00:37, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> > 
> > thank you very much for your careful review.
> > 
> > Il giorno mar, 30/06/2015 alle 13.58 +0200, Tomasz Buchert ha 
> > scritto:
> > > On 30/06/15 12:35, Pietro Battiston wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > 
> > > There is also the "issue" of polluting $PATH with so many
> > > binaries,
> > > but I don't think it's a formal requirement. I think it would be
> > > better
> > > to have "gbutils plot ..." interface.
> > > 
> > 
> > This I think is unavoidable. Typically, running analyzes with such
> > utilities involves calling several of them in a same bash 
> > command...
> > the fact that each can be called with a short and intuitive 
> > sequence of
> > digits is crucial. Something like "gb rand" rather than "gbrand"
> > _could_ in principle work, but I don't think I would prefer it, 
> > both
> > for ease of use and because installing a two-chars executable would
> > actually, to my eyes, create more pollution (increase the 
> > probability
> > of clashes).
> 
> Actually I proposed "gbutils" (not "gb"), but, as I said, there is
> probably no formal requirement in this respect.
> 

Just to clarify: I had understood your suggestion, and my answer to it
is "I don't think it is practical for users". Think of it as replacing
cat, echo, grep and others with "unixutils cat", "unixutils echo",
"unixutils grep"... the similarity breaks when we look at the userbase,
but for those who do use gbutils... I think you get my point.


> > 
> > That said, the fixed package is still at
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gbutils/gbutils_5.6.6
> > -1.dsc
> > 
> > I also uploaded the packaging repo to Alioth, something previously 
> > I
> > had forgot to do:
> > git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/gbutils.git
> 
> You probably forgot to push upstream and pristine-tar branches.
> Och, and moreover, Vcs-Browser is wrong. You can use:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/gbutils.git
> 

Fixed, thanks. I don't know what had made me so sure that the link was
right and I had to just wait the 6 hours time to see it work.
I now also pushed the upstream and pristine-tar branches, as well as
the tags.

Related to your other email, I updated build-depends and depends so
that now all utilities/functionalities are compiled and installed, and
introduced a patch fixing a few typos in the previously not installed
utilities.

Updated package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gbutils/gbutils_5.6.6
-1.dsc

Thanks again!

Pietro


Reply to: