On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:43:57PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote:
> After reading a little more about shared lib naming & SONAME, I think I
> understand. So instead of the current libhiredis.so.0 symlink we want a
> libhiredis.so.0.13 symlink & the "real name" of the shared lib would be
> something like libhiredis.so.0.13.1? That would certainly make life easier.
You don't need to invent a "real name", just removing the symlink would be
enough.
> I'm happy to make the case upstream, but is it sane to work around this in
> the packaging while that gets figured out?
I think so.
--
WBR, wRAR