On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 10:43:57PM -0700, Tom Lee wrote: > After reading a little more about shared lib naming & SONAME, I think I > understand. So instead of the current libhiredis.so.0 symlink we want a > libhiredis.so.0.13 symlink & the "real name" of the shared lib would be > something like libhiredis.so.0.13.1? That would certainly make life easier. You don't need to invent a "real name", just removing the symlink would be enough. > I'm happy to make the case upstream, but is it sane to work around this in > the packaging while that gets figured out? I think so. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature