[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#783277: RFS: gnome-exe-thumbnailer/0.9.3 [ITP]



Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-exe-thumbnailer"

 * Package name    : gnome-exe-thumbnailer
   Version         : 0.9.3
   Upstream Author : 2010-2012 Jan Nekvasil <jan.nekvasil@ryant.cz>
                     2009-2010 Christian Dannie Storgaard <cybolic@gmail.com>
                     2009-2012 Scott Ritchie <scottritchie@ubuntu.com>
 * URL             : http://wiki.winehq.org/exe-thumbnailer
 * License         : LGPL-2.1+
   Section         : gnome

It builds those binary packages:

  gnome-exe-thumbnailer - Wine .exe and other executable thumbnailer for Gnome

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnome-exe-thumbnailer


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-exe-thumbnailer/gnome-exe-thumbnailer_0.9.3.dsc

More information about gnome-exe-thumbnailer can be obtained from http://wiki.winehq.org/exe-thumbnailer.

Changes since the last upload:

gnome-exe-thumbnailer (0.9.3) unstable; urgency=medium

  * Initial Debian release, forked from Ubuntu. (Closes: #767376)
  * Update debian/ files:
     - Set myself as maintainer.
     - Bump to debhelper 9.
     - Remove outdated gconf2 build-dependency, depend on libglib2.0-bin
       instead (for theme fetching).
     - Remove unnecessary dependency on python.
     - Update Standards Version to 3.9.6.
     - Set priority to optional from extra.
     - Include my changes in debian/copyright.
     - Remove /usr/share/gconf/schemas from dirs file.
     - Explicitly set source/format to 3.0 native. This is what the Ubuntu
       packaging seems to suggest, as there is only one .tar.gz
       file available for download.

 -- James Lu <glolol1@hotmail.com>  Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:20:35 -0700

Regards,
 James Lu


Reply to: