On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 12:21:57PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Bill Blough wrote: > > > That's an interesting thought. That would likely resolve the issue as filed in > > the bug report against the xalan executables. However the same problem would > > still technically exist in the underlying library code (libxalan-c). Though, > > having never done any programming against libxslt, that might be a longer path > > for me than just fixing xalan. > > Probably libxalan-c would be the best place to implement it? Probably so. And while it's an intriguing idea to think about, in my opinion it defeats the purpose, since xalan is an xlst implementation that provides an alternative to libxslt. Regards, Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature