Bug#736884: Bug#736885: RFS: gdal/1.10.1+dfsg-4
On 01/28/2014 08:03 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:20:39AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> gdal is currently involved in the ongoing poppler transition. To
>>> not entangle the poppler and libepsilon transition, please talk to
>>> the Release Team and wait for their OK. (I don't know how many
>>> packages are involved in the libepsilon transition, but you might
>>> want to read [1] on how to coordinate transitions with the Release
>>> Team.)
>>
>> GDAL is already marked 'good' in the poppler transition, that doesn't
>> seem to be a problem. The openjpeg transition in which it's include
>> via poppler may be.
>>
>> Since only gdal and librasterlite need to be rebuild for the new
>> libepsilon skipping the release team was not protested. See:
>>
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/01/msg00054.html
>>
>>> But anyway, this upload is not required. Once the new libepsilon
>>> got built and installed everywhere,
>
> libepsilon is just uploaded
Thanks.
>>> it is enough to request
>>> binNMUs. reportbug release.debian.org has a template for that.
>>
>> Andreas, should we go this route instead?
>
> Requesting binNMUs would do less stress test to my poor connection. :-)
>
> I'd also like to say that you are asking for sponsoring 1.1~svn11-3 in
> #736884 but Git has only 1.1g-3 which is just in experimental.
Because master already has 1.1g, the changes for 1.1~svn-3 live in the
1.1_svn11 branch. But this won't be required anymore.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GnuPG: 0xE88D4AF1 (new) / 0x77A975AD (old)
Reply to: