[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#758646: RFS: ryu/3.12-1 [ITP]



> Hi!
> 
> A last issue...
> 
> I think that there a mistake in d/copyright. You removed the original
> debian/ when you generated the tarball and remade the debian/
> structure. So, I think you must remove the upstream name from debian/*
> in d/copyright and should add a d/README.source to explain about the
> original debian/ remotion.
> 
> I will wait your opinion.
> 

I will leave them there because some of things they have done I kept. 

I think that explaining removal of debian/ is not neccessary. It is
generally done out of the box by git-import-orig anyways. But
personally I think it does not hurt, I added the explanation as you
suggested. 

The new version is in mentors. 

> 
> 
> 2014-08-27 3:40 GMT-03:00 Dariusz Dwornikowski
> <dariusz.dwornikowski@cs.put.poznan.pl>:
> >> Hi Dariusz, how are you?
> >>
> >> Please:
> >>
> >> 1. d/clean: you package doesn't build twice because the d/clean
> >> removes files only (not directories - man dh_clean). :-P
> >>
> >> I saw you are using an override in d/rules to remove files. Why you
> >> need a d/clean?
> >
> > I fixed that, now it is onlu in d/rules. I use git-buildpackage, my
> > build area is in a different place, so for me the package always built
> > cleanly twice.
> >
> >>
> >> 2. d/control: in short descriptions, remove the program name and put
> >> each designation between brackets. My suggestion:
> >>
> >> Description: defined networking framework (Python libs)
> >> Description: defined networking framework (ryu binary)
> >> Description: defined networking framework (docs)
> >
> > Great advice, I followed it.
> >
> >>
> >> You can change it.
> >>
> >> 3. d/copyright:
> >>     - debin?  :-D
> >>     - Please, review all source code carefully. I didn't see the
> >> 'Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation' in your d/copyright.
> >
> > Yes, I updated the copyright, also did som clarification on a "weird"
> > license I encoutered inside on debian-legal@ [1].
> >
> >>
> >> 4. d/docs: I think that this file is a mistake because you created the
> >> python-ryu-doc.docs. Am I wrong?
> >>
> >
> > You are not wrong mister :) I deleted the docs file.
> >
> >> 5. d/ryu-bin.ryu.init: please, remove all useless lines as "Add code
> >> here, if necessary,...".
> >
> > I deleted not needed comments.
> >
> >>
> >> 6. d/ryu.conf: I think it is confused. Can you add comments to help
> >> the user? Please, adopt a format to commented lines (# with spaces or
> >> # without spaces).
> >
> > Did some research on this, kept only options needed to run basic ryu
> > and commented them. I deleted options connected to OpenStack, if
> > someone wants to run OpenStack with ryu, they should use OpenStack's
> > doc howto do it, not  ryu's.
> >>
> > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2014/08/msg00073.html
> >
> >
> > I uploaded the new version to mentors.
> >
> > --
> > Dariusz Dwornikowski,
> >   Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology
> >   www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/
> >   room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41

-- 
Dariusz Dwornikowski, 
  Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology
  www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/  
  room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: