Re: netcdf packages
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: netcdf packages
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 09:02:03 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20140403070203.GB12816@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <CAK6Z60fCu0eBoQz7Oqmy4RY=Q6nnUe6rE4D605bikUpdo8UJAg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAK6Z60eydWNd5n1BXuifMtXbV=_ZDr73Q6qb+pxYbUXvjVWgyw@mail.gmail.com> <2572115.ZjIftkGxgs@ylum> <27a60a5d-44f9-41c2-b45e-52be470bf936@email.android.com> <CAK6Z60fCu0eBoQz7Oqmy4RY=Q6nnUe6rE4D605bikUpdo8UJAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 01:41:09PM +0200, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Everything that is interesting in the current netcdf-bin is included
> in the C-library of netCDF. The only binaries included in the C++ and
> Fortran builds are configuration assistants that are losing their
> significance in the new CMake builds anyways.
> Hence, I'd say it's reasonable to make netcdfc-bin the "new" netcdf-bin.
So a
Conflicts: netcdf-bin
Provides: netcdf-bin
might do the trick, right?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: