Re: netcdf packages
Everything that is interesting in the current netcdf-bin is included
in the C-library of netCDF. The only binaries included in the C++ and
Fortran builds are configuration assistants that are losing their
significance in the new CMake builds anyways.
Hence, I'd say it's reasonable to make netcdfc-bin the "new" netcdf-bin.
Cheers,
Nico
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Eric L. <ewl+debian+nospam2014@lavar.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 March 2014 09:20:01 CET, Dominique Dumont <dod@debian.org> wrote:
>>On Thursday 27 March 2014 22:21:55 Nico Schlömer wrote:
>>The question is: how to avoid breaking the above package when upgrading
>>netcdf
>>to netcdf-c, netcdf-fortran, netcdf-cxx ?
> What about declaring netcdf-bin as dummy package depending on the 3 new ones, and ask (or file bugs against) the dependent package(r)s to change their dependencies.
>
> Eric
>
> I'm on debian-java, java maintainers, vdr maintainers and debian-mentors; no need to CC me on these lists. Thanks!
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 27a60a5d-44f9-41c2-b45e-52be470bf936@email.android.com">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 27a60a5d-44f9-41c2-b45e-52be470bf936@email.android.com
>
Reply to: