Stephen Kitt [2014-03-19 23:25 +0100]: > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to change DEP8 to encourage building > > > > whatever is strictly required for the tests, and perhaps drop > > > > "build-needed" altogether? > > > > I wouldn't want to drop build-needed, as it only complicates things > > for the cases where people want it. But I'm happy to add a stanza to > > its documentation to avoid it for packages which take a nontrivial > > amount of time to build; does that sound like an acceptable > > compromise? > > It does indeed, with Jakub's idea of copying only the required code to > $ADTTMP too. Done now: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b4ffe65ce Language/grammar/style corrections appreciated :) Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature