[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#738683: marked as done (RFS: hexchat/2.9.6.1-1 [ITP])



Your message dated Tue, 18 Feb 2014 21:27:24 -0800
with message-id <CACZd_tABZM8o-nEEea0PSANZ-KQ-xaxeN8V+FrapO4-CFUvyiw@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#738683: RFS: hexchat/2.9.6.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #738683,
regarding RFS: hexchat/2.9.6.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
738683: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=738683
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hexchat"

   Package name : hexchat
   Version                      : 2.9.6.1-1
   Upstream Author      : Berke Viktor
   URL                  : http://hexchat.github.io
   License                      : GPL-2 with OpenSSL exception
   Section                      : net

It builds these binary packages:
        hexchat                 - IRC client for X based on X-Chat 2
        hexchat-common  - Common files for HexChat

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/hexchat

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexchat/hexchat_2.9.6.1-1.dsc

More information about HexChat can be obtained from http://hexchat.github.io/
and http://hexchat.readthedocs.org/.

Please let me know if you need any more information.

Regards,
        Jesse Rhodes (sney)



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Jesse Rhodes <drubo@drubo.net> wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Here's the rest:
>
> 1) Recommends line moved back to where it should be
>
> 2) There is no doxygen-built documentation distributed with this
> package; I discussed it with #debian-mentors and they seemed to think
> that the Doxyfile in the upstream tarball is only there for
> development purposes and its output wouldn't be necessary in a binary
> distribution. (The plugin interface is documented separately, and
> already included in hexchat-common.)
>
> 3) I turned on verbose building and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is indeed
> being used when python.so is being compiled, so that would make this
> an upstream issue, correct? Anything in particular I should mention
> when I report it to them?
>
> 4) The weird debian/rules targets were because I referred to the xchat
> package for examples, and its debian/rules may have been written
> originally before dh overrides were available/widely known. What I did
> worked, so I accepted it and moved on. I have switched the format to
> override_dh_* targets now.
>
> 5) debian/watch updated.
>
> Let me know your thoughts on the license exception, as well as point 2
> in this email, and then I'll re-upload with the final decision.

For those following along on #738683, the remaining issues were solved
on #debian-mentors.

Anyways, built, signed, and uploaded; thanks for your contribution to Debian!

Regards,
Vincent

--- End Message ---

Reply to: