Bug#738683: RFS: hexchat/2.9.6.1-1 [ITP]

[Jesse Rhodes <drubo@drubo.net>]

Hi Vincent,

Here's the rest:

1) Recommends line moved back to where it should be

2) There is no doxygen-built documentation distributed with this
package; I discussed it with #debian-mentors and they seemed to think
that the Doxyfile in the upstream tarball is only there for
development purposes and its output wouldn't be necessary in a binary
distribution. (The plugin interface is documented separately, and
already included in hexchat-common.)

3) I turned on verbose building and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 is indeed
being used when python.so is being compiled, so that would make this
an upstream issue, correct? Anything in particular I should mention
when I report it to them?

4) The weird debian/rules targets were because I referred to the xchat
package for examples, and its debian/rules may have been written
originally before dh overrides were available/widely known. What I did
worked, so I accepted it and moved on. I have switched the format to
override_dh_* targets now.

5) debian/watch updated.

Let me know your thoughts on the license exception, as well as point 2
in this email, and then I'll re-upload with the final decision.

sney