[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Is this really the debian way ?



----------------------------------------
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> From: nospam@vuorela.dk
> Subject: Re: Is this really the debian way ?
> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 15:10:26 +0000
>
> On 2014-02-08, Roelof Wobben <rwobben@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS_libcjs0c = -Xusr/lib/cjs-1.0/ -V'libcjs0c (>= $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)), libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS)' -- -c4
>
> I don't see anything wrong here. It is not in the 'beginners end' of
> library packaging, and library packaging is not in the 'beginners end'
> of packaging.
>
> The more complex the libraries, the more complex you often need to be in
> your rules file.
>
> In this case, it ensures that anything that links libcjs0c ensures that
> it is installed along with the libcjs0-$(LIBMOZJS) package.
>
> /Sune
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] ld85p2$hdn$1@ger.gmane.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] ld85p2$hdn$1@ger.gmane.org
>

Thanks for the explanation.

Roelof 		 	   		  

Reply to: