Re: debian/copyright + cc-by-sa
On 2014-02-09 17:29, Felix Natter wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> writes:
>> There is no "short" version you can use in d/copyright - you have to
>> list the full license of CC-BY-SA-3.0 as it is not in common-licenses.
>> Though, if you have it in a stand-alone license paragraph, you can just
>> omit the part you showed above.
>
> Just to be sure: So this:
>
> Files: ./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.svg
> ./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.png
> ./freeplane/resources/images/Freeplane_splash.png
> Copyright: 2013-2014 Robert Gibson
> License: CC-BY-SA-3.0
> THE WORK (AS DEFINED BELOW) IS PROVIDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS CREATIVE
> COMMONS PUBLIC LICENSE ("CCPL" OR "LICENSE"). THE WORK IS PROTECTED BY
> COPYRIGHT AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LAW. ANY USE OF THE WORK OTHER THAN AS
> AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS LICENSE OR COPYRIGHT LAW IS PROHIBITED.
> .
> BY EXERCISING ANY RIGHTS TO THE WORK PROVIDED HERE, YOU ACCEPT AND AGREE
> TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE. TO THE EXTENT THIS LICENSE MAY
> BE CONSIDERED TO BE A CONTRACT, THE LICENSOR GRANTS YOU THE RIGHTS
> CONTAINED HERE IN CONSIDERATION OF YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH TERMS AND
> CONDITIONS.
> .
> 1. Definitions
>
> [...]
>
> Except for the limited purpose of indicating to the public that the Work
> is licensed under the CCPL, Creative Commons does not authorize the use
> by either party of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any related
> trademark or logo of Creative Commons without the prior written consent
> of Creative Commons. Any permitted use will be in compliance with
> Creative Commons' then-current trademark usage guidelines, as may be
> published on its website or otherwise made available upon request from
> time to time. For the avoidance of doubt, this trademark restriction
> does not form part of the License.
>
> (from http://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-SA-3.0) is correct?
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
>
Yes, to my knowledge that would be a valid d/copyright (assuming the
missing " ." around [...] is omitted only in this mail).
~Niels
Reply to: