[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: debian/copyright + cc-by-sa



Hi Niels,

Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> writes:
> There is no "short" version you can use in d/copyright - you have to
> list the full license of CC-BY-SA-3.0 as it is not in common-licenses.
> Though, if you have it in a stand-alone license paragraph, you can just
> omit the part you showed above.

Just to be sure: So this:

Files: ./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.svg
       ./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.png
       ./freeplane/resources/images/Freeplane_splash.png
Copyright: 2013-2014 Robert Gibson
License: CC-BY-SA-3.0
 THE WORK (AS DEFINED BELOW) IS PROVIDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS CREATIVE
 COMMONS PUBLIC LICENSE ("CCPL" OR "LICENSE"). THE WORK IS PROTECTED BY
 COPYRIGHT AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LAW. ANY USE OF THE WORK OTHER THAN AS
 AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS LICENSE OR COPYRIGHT LAW IS PROHIBITED.
 .
 BY EXERCISING ANY RIGHTS TO THE WORK PROVIDED HERE, YOU ACCEPT AND AGREE
 TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE. TO THE EXTENT THIS LICENSE MAY
 BE CONSIDERED TO BE A CONTRACT, THE LICENSOR GRANTS YOU THE RIGHTS
 CONTAINED HERE IN CONSIDERATION OF YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF SUCH TERMS AND
 CONDITIONS.
 .
 1. Definitions 

 [...]

 Except for the limited purpose of indicating to the public that the Work
 is licensed under the CCPL, Creative Commons does not authorize the use
 by either party of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any related
 trademark or logo of Creative Commons without the prior written consent
 of Creative Commons. Any permitted use will be in compliance with
 Creative Commons' then-current trademark usage guidelines, as may be
 published on its website or otherwise made available upon request from
 time to time. For the avoidance of doubt, this trademark restriction
 does not form part of the License.    

(from http://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-SA-3.0) is correct?

Thanks and Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter


Reply to: