Re: Bug#737493: RFS: iceowl-l10n/2.6.4-1 [NMU]
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:35:37PM +0000, Wookey wrote:
[..snip..]
> He's started that process, but shouldn't have to wait for it to complete
> before we do an upload. I guess it would be better if the maintainer was
> his sponsor. Guido?
I'm fine with an upload but don't have the time to review it for at
least a couple of days. The package has little potential for hard
breackage so I'm perfectly fine with a sponsored upload by any DD -
especially if it goes to experimental first.
Cheers,
-- Guido
Reply to: