Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]
- To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>
- Cc: 728059@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#728059: RFS: gnome-shell-pomodoro/0.6.20131027-1 [ITA]
- From: Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 22:39:40 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] CACZd_tBPUb7sRQ3-8j0oDtCjx2mkTmYOZXWrJpjs4NRbwfrbCA@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org>, 728059@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <CAPQicOzmerFk8u6-Jpp+6rgnic2Ou95TzDi7QTvegqu5eg8OWw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPQicOzHiX7BReze1qH+MjimwX4Scyt=UhsaFL5nNo1biaa2_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CACZd_tB6a97=797t0XK4hfnZb0dV65onTYP=ZKMf1BjsqgRo8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPQicOz_nMTUAFt-bBSY+giEcQpgA5Qd-Nd+NcsJyFBavBHd9g@mail.gmail.com> <CACZd_tB+ve3SPDOdL0gHG-biDg8arrUuUcTavM+t9vWxwPsDLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPQicOwKpQswGF8hwc_8+hFZXAwuGouXFJZf9JRiR40FjPi8hA@mail.gmail.com> <CACZd_tBquN3wDWX2NNbuUu889ntxNkTT7J54D+d_XbJK=Sn5OQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPQicOxN67ATetayOOdP_kPc6+jkxQTtKhWMEkCYfhOw6R5JPA@mail.gmail.com> <CACZd_tAge-+iqFQ1mrjtgU2Qb+tnSFtfHU-nr0OV9H1O0iKKrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPQicOzmerFk8u6-Jpp+6rgnic2Ou95TzDi7QTvegqu5eg8OWw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Thanks for this advice. :-)
>
> I chose to use the patching approach because I found it cleaner (and
> wanted to play with quilt once again!).
> I recreated the package from the upstream 0.8 tag and used quilt to
> integrate the fixes in one patch.
> Package have been uploaded to mentors.
> Please tell me if you have remarks.
You're already using source format '3.0 (quilt)', so please remove the
extraneous build-dep on quilt and the "--with quilt" invocation in
d/rules.
Some more extra pedantic comments:
- Why priority: extra instead of optional? Most packages should be set
to optional by default (yes, I'm aware dh_make uses priority: extra as
default for some reason) unless they conflict with packages of higher
priority (Policy 2.5).
- Please use "wrap-and-sort -s" from devscripts to have your
build-deps and deps in d/control listed one per line and in
alphabetical order (this generally makes it a _lot_ easier to review
changes to build-dep/dep fields in d/control).
- Consider removing the commented lines (the unused Vcs-* fields) in d/control
I've run out of things to nitpick, so I think that means your package
is about ready to be uploaded. ;)
Cheers,
Vincent
Reply to: