[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#667904: marked as done (RFS: mitlm/0.4-1 [ITP] -- MIT Language Modeling toolkit)



Your message dated Mon, 6 May 2013 22:07:43 +0200
with message-id <20130506200743.GA6369@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#667904: RFS: mitlm/0.4-1 [ITP] -- MIT Language Modeling
has caused the Debian Bug report #667904,
regarding RFS: mitlm/0.4-1 [ITP] -- MIT Language Modeling toolkit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
667904: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667904
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mitlm"

* Package name    : mitlm
  Version         : 0.4
  Upstream Author : Bo-June (Paul) Hsu <bohsu@mit.edu>
* URL             : http://code.google.com/p/mitlm/
* License         : BSD
  Programming Lang: (C, C++, Fortran)
  Section         : misc

It builds those binary packages:

 libmitlm0  - MIT Language Modeling toolkit library
 libmitlm0-dbg - MIT Language Modeling toolkit debug symbols
 libmitlm0-dev - MIT Language Modeling toolkit development files
 mitlm - MIT Language Modeling toolkit

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/mitlm


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mitlm/mitlm_0.4-1.dsc

Regards,
   Giulio Paci



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Uploaded.

--
Jakub Wilk

--- End Message ---

Reply to: