[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Restrictive Artwork License



On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote:
> I guess, it means that having the icons in a jar file isn't OK, having
> them in the file system is OK

Jar files are .zip files. Does this mean that you can't have images in
the same tarball as a GPL'd program in a tarfile?

I don't think that's right. As far as I know, this only triggers when
it's a derived work and/or sharing memory (speaking in the general
case), not when it's distributed in the same zip file.

> but java was always a border case because
> it doesn't "link" as it was understood when the GPL2 was written (GPL3
> might even be another story).

Even considering code in the same jarfile as "linked", I don't think
you can link an image to code in the same way.

Much love,
  Paul

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>  |   Proud Debian Developer
: :'  : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'`  http://people.debian.org/~paultag
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: