[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#732135: RFS: spatialite/4.1.1-5



Control: reassign -1 sponsorship-requests

On Sb, 14 dec 13, 16:24:20, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: sponshorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> As part of the upcoming SpatiaLite transition am I looking for a sponsor for
> my package "spatialite".
> 
> Please refer to the thread on debian-gis@ for more information on this
> transition: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2013/10/msg00009.html
> 
>  Package name    : spatialite
>  Version         : 4.1.1-5
>  Upstream Author : Alessandro Furieri <a.furieri@lqt.it>
>  URL             : https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/
>  License         : MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0+ or LGPL-2.1+
>  Section         : science
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
>  libspatialite-dev - Geospatial extension for SQLite - development files
>  libspatialite5 - Geospatial extension for SQLite - libraries
>  libspatialite5-dbg - Geospatial extension for SQLite - debugging symbols
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
> 
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/spatialite
> 
> 
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> 
> dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spatialite/spatialite_4.1.1-5.dsc
> 
> More information about SpatiaLite can be obtained from https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/.
> 
> Changes since the last upload:
> 
>  * Enable building with libxml2 support.
>  * Add 11-link-libxml2.patch to link libxml2 when building test cases.
>  * Update symbols file for XML related symbols.
>  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5, no changes required.
> 
> 
> Regards,
>  Sebastiaan Couwenberg

-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: