[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#726533: RFS: 0install/2.3.3-2 [ITP] -- rename and split zeroinstall-injector package



On 2013-10-16 15:08, Thomas Leonard wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. I have split it into
separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. This saves
around 100 MB when deploying to a fresh server. Could someone check it and
approve the new package names? My previous mentor (Jens Peter Secher) is no
longer a DD.

Hi, could someone approve this package split?

I don't think there's anything complicated about this request - it's just splitting and renaming an existing package. There shouldn't be any problems with the new packages (but if there are, I'll fix them - I've been maintaining this package for several years now).

[ I originally submitted this request in Sep 2012, but after six months it got automatically deleted, so I'm hoping to avoid that happening again: see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685998 ]

Thanks,


  * Package name    : 0install
    Version         : 2.3.3-2
    Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
  * URL             : http://0install.net/
  * License         : GNU Lesser General Public License 2.1
    Section         : admin

It now builds these binary packages:

   0install      - cross-distribution packaging system
   0install-core - cross-distribution packaging system (non-GUI parts)
   zeroinstall-injector - transitional package for 0install

I updated the name as "injector" is no longer used, and the main command is now
"0install".

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

   http://mentors.debian.net/package/0install


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

   dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_2.3.3-2.dsc

More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net



Reply to: