Re: Package dropped from testing/unstable: ITP or ITA?

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Package dropped from testing/unstable: ITP or ITA?
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:18:46 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKTje6HVUCuML=eS7JiFMpJQyGdavoPQbibf7w_TTmvzCRBH+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAL4BjX=FiCN4LfrHHcVOZNSQ6E4ZDFc=uAjcuxU_uBEG+StqJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAL4BjX=FiCN4LfrHHcVOZNSQ6E4ZDFc=uAjcuxU_uBEG+StqJw@mail.gmail.com>

Please read the devref section about reintroducing packages:

http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#reintroducing-pkgs

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

References:
- Package dropped from testing/unstable: ITP or ITA?
  - From: "Robert J. Clay" <rjclay@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#718893: RFS: coinutils/2.9.4-1 [ITA] -- CoinOR base library
Next by Date: Bug#712026: transcriber review
Previous by thread: Re: Package dropped from testing/unstable: ITP or ITA?
Next by thread: Bug#717000: New version on mentors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread