Bug#715023: RFS: bitz-server/0.1.1-1 [ITP]
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Uditha Atukorala <uditha@geniusse.com>, 2013-07-05, 22:48:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bitz-server/bitz-server_0.1.1-2.dsc
Why is .orig.tar different than the one uscan downloads?
The package FTBFS here:
checking for a Python interpreter with version >= 2.7... none
configure: error: no suitable Python interpreter found
Lintian emits:
I: bitz-server source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package libbitz-server-mod-py
I: bitz-server source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package libbitz-server-mod-py-modules
I: bitz-server source: duplicate-short-description bitz-server bitz-server-dev
I: bitz-server source: duplicate-short-description libicap0 libicap0-dev
P: bitz-server source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5
My pet peeve: you build-depend on "debhelper (>= 9.0.0)", but debhelper
no longer uses such a versioning scheme. You probably wanted to say
"debhelper (>= 9)".
--
Jakub Wilk
Reply to: