[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706514: marked as done (RFS: dcraw/9.19-1)



Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 19:58:52 +0300
with message-id <[🔎] CALF6qJm3KSe8VPieZuELyagBjY+ZDoiBYgrdt+ssn9TTFvSiTA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #706514,
regarding RFS: dcraw/9.19-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
706514: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706514
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dcraw"

* Package name    : dcraw
  Version         : 9.17-1
  Upstream Author : Dave Coffin, dcoffin a cybercom period net
* URL             : http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/
* License         : GPL v2
  Section         : graphics

It builds those binary packages:

  dcraw - decode raw digital camera images

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/dcraw


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dcraw/dcraw_9.17-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:

 * New upstream release (Closes: #617543)
 * Build-depend on libjasper-dev


Regards,
   Oliver Sander

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Oliver,

[Quoting your private mail to me, hoping there is nothing private]

2013/7/19 Oliver Sander <sander@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>:
>> You want to upload
>> a newer version without intend to maintain it. Right?
>>
> No.  I made up my mind and I promise to be the dcraw maintainer if that
> is what it takes.

The package cannot be adopted now as it is not yet orphaned. CC-ing
MIA-team, as, it seems, the current maintainer Steve King is not active
in Debian any more. He was CC-ed several times in this bug-thread without
any reaction from his side.

>> Yes, but pay attention, NMU is only for critical bug-fixes. Not for
>> new versions or minor changes. See Debian Policy.
>>
>
> A new package has been uploaded, which now has the version 9.19-1.

Gregor is right, we can do NMU with the new version of the package (thanks him).
Sorry for confusing, I did not know that. I have changed your debian/changelog
accordingly.

>>> See above.  The actual maintainer added those files to the package,
>>> and I don't really know what they do.  But just because _I_ don't
>>> know what they do that doesn't mean they don't serve a purpose.
>>> That's why I kept them in.
>>
>>
>> gpg_key is not in a current version of dcraw [1], [2].
>
>
> Wow, you are right!  That must be my own gpg_key which must have crept in
> there
> silently when I created it for packaging.  Sorry for screwing this up.
> It's gone now.
>
>
>  .badpixels, as
>>
>> i understand
>> should not be in a package either, as it is camera-specific file [3].
>> Why then should
>> it be in the package?
>
>
> As I said: no clue, it wasn't me who put it there.  It is also gone now.
>
> What's next?

Ok, I have uploaded the package. Thanks for contributing! I hope
you have learned something from this cooperation.

I did not use DELAYED-queue as the original maintainer had enough
time to react.

Hope, you will continue you work on Debian!

Best regards,

Anton

--- End Message ---

Reply to: