Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1
Add to description something like: "Fixing lintiant warnings in manpages".
I will do that, but please comment on my questions below first.
Plus, we are now at dcraw-9.19-1.1, because upstream has made two new
releases
in the meantime.
,,,1.1 is not correct version number. You are not doing NMU,
so the last number should be "integer". See the Debian Policy.
I don't understand. I am not the maintainer, hence what I am doing
is a NMU, hence the NMU number? Please tell me the version number
you want and I'll use it.
I still do not understand, what are you doing with patch.
import_from_old_1.0_format.diff:
a) why do you add gpg_key? What is that?
I have no clue. It is not from upstream, but must have been added
by the package maintainer instead. I didn't want to remove
it without knowing why it is there.
b) why do you add badpixel, if it is shipped by upstream?
Same here: I am just keeping what the actual package currently in Debian
does. In this case, upstream ships a file .badpixels (note the leading
dot), and the packaging renames it to badpixels (without the dot).
No idea why.
best,
Oliver
Patches are only to fix some problems, in the source code.
No need to add there everything.
Please, look also into Debian Developer's reference, if you find time.
Cheers,
Anton
Reply to: