Bug#712056: marked as done (RFS: scantailor/0.9.11.1-1 -- [ITP] interactive post-processing tool for scanned document pages)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:31:58 +1000
with message-id <201306251131.58758.onlyjob@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#712056: RFS: scantailor [ITP] -- interactive post-processing tool for scanned document pages
has caused the Debian Bug report #712056,
regarding RFS: scantailor/0.9.11.1-1 -- [ITP] interactive post-processing tool for scanned document pages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
712056: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712056
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my initial package of Scantailor 0.9.11.1 for Debian.
I've uploaded it to mentors:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/scantailor
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scantailor/scantailor_0.9.11.1-1.dsc
and created a Git repo belonging to the collab-maint group:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/scantailor.git
I've builded against Sid using Cowbuilder, I've uploaded my build log here:
http://www.danielstender.com/uploads/scantailor_0.9.11.1-1_amd64.build
Info on the program could be found here:
http://scantailor.sourceforge.net/
Thanks for any hint, pointers, and reviews in advance!
Regards,
Daniel Stender
--
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
GPG key ID: 1654BD9C
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 02:04:59 Daniel Stender wrote:
> Thanks for additional pointers and the close review - the package
> is going to be much better than it's Ubuntu precursor.
:)
> > * The following copyright holders are not listed in debian/copyright:
> >
> > Vadim Kuznetsov ()DikBSD <dikbsd@gmail.com>
> > 2011 Petr Kovar <pejuko@gmail.com>
>
> I've added individual paragraphs for these files.
You can maintain this information in separate paragraphs if you wish
but usually separate paragraphs are used when the license is
different. You can join GPL-3 paragraphs and list all copyright owners
together like we often do for debian/* contributors where we rarely
track who touched a particular file.
For much larger packages it might save you time to update copyrights
whenever you package new upstream version.
Also I have doubts regarding validity of copyright statement for
"Vadim Kuznetsov ()DikBSD <dikbsd@gmail.com>"
due to lack of copyright year(s). Can you please confirm with upstream
eventually?
> > * "Based on code from the GIMP project" is not a copyright statement
> > so perhaps it's better to move it to Comment section. Then it would
> > become obvious that word "Copyright" is used twice in the
> > paragraph.
>
> Yes, I've moved the "based on" info of this files to Comments.
It is a bit strange that you moved one copyright statement to comments
as well... Why? If this copyright statement is valid (and perhaps we
have no reasons to doubt that) then it belong to copyright section. If
that makes sense to you please consider correcting when convenient.
> > Probably you don't need this reminder but when convenient please
> > forward patch and man pages to upstream.
>
> Yes, all right, I'm going to do that.
Thank you.
> Everything has been pushed to the Git repo.
Terrific, I've just uploaded the package for you.
Thanks for your contribution to Debian.
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
I hate all sports as rabidly as a person who likes sports hates common
sense.
-- H. L. Mencken
--- End Message ---
Reply to: