[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#712056: RFS: scantailor [ITP] -- interactive post-processing tool for scanned document pages



On 19.06.2013 22:42, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for your recent corrections. Just few more left to do and I'll
> upload for you.

Thanks for additional pointers and the close review - the package is going to be much better
than it's Ubuntu precursor.

*** control ***

>  * When I mentioned "unnecessary versioned dependencies" I meant that
>    versioning is unnecessary and safe to drop. There is no point
>    writing "cmake (>= 2.8.2+dfsg.1-0+squeeze1)" when just "cmake" is
>    enough because cmake in oldstable is above minimum requirement.
>    Same applies to "libqt4-dev".
> 
>  * Short package description should start with lowercase letter.

Fixed.

*** copyright ***

1)

>  * Upstream uses two emails in source files:
> 
>      Joseph Artsimovich <joseph.artsimovich@gmail.com>
>      Joseph Artsimovich <joseph_a@mail.ru>
> 
>    The latter statement appears to be older (it is often accompanied
>    by years 2007-2008 and one would hardly use this horrible russian
>    email service while having account at gmail).
> 
>    I would at least mention first statement (i.e. contact email) in
>    Upstream-Contact or even include both statement to copyright
>    paragraph as it would be speculative to decide which statement is
>    more important/valid.

I've been in contact with Joseph over <joseph.artsimovich@gmail.com> a couple of
weeks ago. I've just changed that throughout, also in the manpages.

2)

>  * The following copyright holders are not listed in debian/copyright:
> 
>     Vadim Kuznetsov ()DikBSD <dikbsd@gmail.com>
>     2011 Petr Kovar <pejuko@gmail.com>

I've added individual paragraphs for these files.

3)

>  * "Based on code from the GIMP project" is not a copyright statement
>    so perhaps it's better to move it to Comment section. Then it would
>    become obvious that word "Copyright" is used twice in the
>    paragraph.

Yes, I've moved the "based on" info of this files to Comments.

4)

>  * At least one file in "packaging/osx" is under BOOST license. Also
>    file "ScanTailor.icns" is a (sourceless?) binary file...

I've added a licence paragraph for packaging/osx/user-config.jam

5)

>  * "License: PD" perhaps is better written as
>      "License: public-domain".
>    For files in Public-Domain copyright is not applicable so it is
>    better to write "Copyright: not-applicable" but mention origin of
>    files (i.e. Tango project and URL) in Comment field.

Changed that.

6)

>  * One of the man pages is written by "Artem Popov <artfwo@gmail.com>"
>    but that's not how his name is written in debian/copyright. It is
>    always safer to use original statement as written by author without
>    unnecessary translation of person's name to native characters even
>    if it is done correctly.

Yes, all right, changed that.

*** misc ***

1)

>  * Generated man page is not removed on clean.

Added debian/clean for that purpose.

2)

> Probably you don't need this reminder but when convenient please
> forward patch and man pages to upstream.

Yes, all right, I'm going to do that.

Everything has been pushed to the Git repo.

Greetings,
Daniel

-- 
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
GPG key ID: 1654BD9C


Reply to: